The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Shree Arihant Oil and General Mills v. Union of India & Ors. [Civil Writ Petition No. 2932/2023, order dated September 8, 2025] held that Circular No. 181/13/2022-GST dated November 10, 2022, which restricts refund claims on Input Tax Credit (ITC) for applications filed after July 18, 2022, for goods under inverted duty structure such as mustard oil, is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, and inconsistent with Notification No. 09/2022-Central Tax (Rate) and Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Facts:
Shree Arihant Oil and General Mills (“the Petitioner”) is engaged in the manufacture of edible oils including mustard oil, which falls under HSN Code 1514.
The Union of India, through the Department of Revenue, the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, and the GST Council (“the Respondents”) issued Circular No. 181/13/2022-GST, restricting refund claims of accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure (“IDS”) for refund applications filed on or after July 18, 2022.
The Petitioner filed refund applications under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 for the period prior to July 18, 2022, but the refund claim was neither accepted nor rejected by the revenue authorities, allegedly due to reliance on the impugned Circular.
The Petitioner contended that the Circular unlawfully restricts the right to claim refunds for applications filed within the two-year limitation period prescribed under Section 54, beyond July 18, 2022, and that the Circular conflicts with the Notification No. 09/2022-Central Tax (Rate) which is prospective in operation from July 18, 2022.
The Respondents contended that the Circular clarifies the restriction applies prospectively to refund applications filed on or after July 18, 2022, and that the Petitioner is not entitled to refund accordingly.
Issue:
Whether Circular No. 181/13/2022-GST unreasonably restricts refund claims for ITC under inverted duty structure to applications filed only on or before July 18, 2022, thereby violating Article 14 and Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017?
Held:
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 2932/2023 held as under:
- Observed that, the Notification No. 09/2022-Central Tax (Rate) is prospective in nature effective from July 18, 2022, and does not bar refund claims for periods prior to that date.
- Noted that, the Circular impermissibly denies claiming refunds for ITC paid up to July 18, 2022, if the refund application is filed after that date, which is contrary to the statutory limitation period of two years under Section 54.
- Noted that, the Circular is illegal and arbitrary for creating an unreasonable classification between applications filed before and after July 18, 2022, lacking intelligible or rational basis, thus violating Article 14.
- Held that, ITC is an indefeasible right accruing on the date of purchase, and the Circular’s restrictive interpretation curtails this right unjustifiably and quashed and set aside Point No. 2 of Circular No. 181/13/2022-GST to the extent that restricts refund to applications filed after July 18, 2022.
- Further directed Respondents to decide the Petitioner’s refund applications filed on January 4, 2023, in accordance with law, disregarding the impugned Circular, within three months.
Our Comments:
This decision robustly supports taxpayers’ rights by reaffirming the primacy of statute and notifications over executive circulars when there is conflict. The Court correctly identifies the Circular’s restriction as lacking reasonableness and discriminatory in nature. It echoes principles set forth in Patanjali Foods Ltd. v. Union of India [Special Civil Application No. 17298/2024] by the Gujarat High Court. The judgment reasserts that refunds under Section 54 should not be curtailed by administrative clarifications that contradict express law or constitutional equality principles.
Relevant Provisions:
Circular No. 181/13/2022-GST (dated November 10, 2022):
“ Issue 2. Whether the restriction placed on refund of unutilised input tax credit on account of inverted duty structure in case of certain goods falling under chapter 15 and 27 vide Notification No. 09/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022, which has been made effective from 18.07.2022, would apply to the refund applications pending as on 18.07.2022 also or whether the same will apply only to the refund applications filed on or after 18.07.2022 or whether the same will be applicable only to refunds pertaining to prospective tax periods?
Clarification: Vide Notification No. 09/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022, under the powers conferred by clause (ii) of the first proviso to sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017, certain goods falling under chapter 15 and 27 have been specified in respect of which no refund of unutilised input tax credit shall be allowed, where the credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on the output supplies of such specified goods (other than nil rated or fully exempt supplies). The said notification has come into force with effect from 18.07.2022. The restriction imposed vide Notification No. 09/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022 on refund of unutilised input tax credit on account of inverted duty structure in case of specified goods falling under chapter 15 and 27 would apply prospectively only. Accordingly, it is clarified that the restriction imposed by the said notification would be applicable in respect of all refund applications filed on or after 18.07.2022, and would not apply to the refund applications filed before 18.07.2022.”
CLICK HERE FOR OFFICIAL JUDGMENT COPY
(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
