Madras HC order offers new hope for GST credit on properties built for rent
An order issued by the Madras High Court last month could provide tax relief to builders by mandating that tax […]
Madras High Court
Currency seized during investigation as evidence of Hawala transactions is a ‘thing’ under Section 110(3) of the Customs Act and not ‘goods’ – Six-month time limit for issuance of SCN inapplicable
The Hon’ble Madras High Court (Division Bench) in Principal Commissioner of Customs v. Shri Vikram Jain [W.A. No. 1855 of
Scope of Rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act is Confined to Errors Apparent on the Face of Record
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Scals Enterprises v. The Commercial Tax Officer [W.P. No. 22391 of 2026 dated June
Partners of a Partnership Firm are personally liable for GST dues of the Firm and bank account of an erstwhile partner can be attached for recovery
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. VRAA and Co. v. Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central
Prima facie satisfaction and not conclusive proof of fraud is sufficient to invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Fastenex Private Limited & Ors. v. State Tax Officer & Ors. [W.P. Nos. 35967,
‘Harishchandra, Yudhishthir extinct’: Madras High Court flags Rs 32 lakh ‘GST recovery’
Questioning why an official’s claim should be accepted without any verification, the Madras High Court recently referred to mythological figures
IRFC gets Madras High Court relief as ₹353-crore GST demand set aside
State-owned Indian Railway Finance Corporation (IRFC) has secured interim relief from the Madras High Court after the court set aside
Disparity between seigniorage fee paid and supply value declared in GSTR-1 justifies invocation of extended period of limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in KPR Enterprises v. State Tax Officer [W.P. Nos. 35453, 35458 and 35463 of 2024
Ratification is no substitute for recommendation – Notifications travelling beyond GST Council recommendations are ultra vires
The Hon’ble Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) in M/s. Guru and Co. v. Union of India & Ors. [W.P.(MD) Nos.
ITC Cannot Be Denied Solely on the Ground that the Supplier was Subsequently Declared Non-Existent, Without Examining the Documentary Evidence Furnished by the Assessee
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Clear Secured Service Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) [Writ
