Writ petition against Show Cause Notice is premature before reply
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Renaatus Projects Private Limited v. The Joint Director & Anr. [W.P. No. 32465 of […]
Madras High Court
Quashed SCN and Orders disallowing ITC under section 16(4) & 16(2)(c), on the basis of insertion Section 16(5) of the CGST Act
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in R.K. Enterprises v. Union of India & Ors. [W.P. Nos. 3457, 3465 & 34753
Delay of 288 days in filing of GST appeal condoned on account of ill health and non-receipt of notice
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of T. Porkodi v. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) & Anr. [Writ Petition
Mere dismissal of rectification application without modifying original order does not warrant personal hearing
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Eminent Textiles Mills Private Limited v. The State Tax Officer [W.A(MD) No. 1821 of
Section 74 proceedings held unsustainable due to mechanical approach despite taxpayer furnishing CA certificate
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of JIT Auto Comp v. Assistant Commissioner [W.P. No. 16474 of 2024
SCN covering multiple financial years frustrates the limitation period in GST Law
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of R A and Co v. The Additional Commissioner of Central Taxes,
Extension of limitation Period requires strict compliance with force majeure conditions with GST Council recommendation
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Tata Play Limited v. Union of India and Others [W.P. Nos. 17184 of 2023
Writ not maintainable when alternate remedy exists, but should not be stringent
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Eximio Services and Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. The Superintendent of GST & Central Excise
HC directs Department to consider matter afresh where reply filed by the Taxpayer through email has not been considered and opportunity of personal hearing not granted
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s Shree Balaji Enterprises v. Joint Commissioner of GST & Central
HC quashes Ex-Parte Order and directs the department to ensure proper service of notice through various modes in order to ensure that the object of Section 169 is fulfilled
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in M/s Namasivaya Auto Parts v. The Deputy State Tax Officer I [WP No. 19315