The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Reliance Formulation Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Anr [R/Special Civil Application No. 5453 of 2025, order dated June 27, 2025] held that recovery of interest on self-assessed tax under Section 50(1) of the GST Act can be initiated only after following the procedure prescribed under Rule 142B and issuance of intimation in Form GST DRC-01D.
Facts:
Reliance Formulation Private Limited (“the Petitioner”), a registered entity under the Central and State Goods and Services Tax Acts, had been filing returns under Section 39 of the GST Act since July 1, 2017. The Petitioner received an advisory dated December 18, 2024, covering multiple financial years, directing payment of interest under Section 50(1) of the CGST Act for delayed payment of self-assessed tax. The advisory stated that in the event of non-payment of interest under Section 50(1), recovery under Section 79 of the CGST Act could be initiated.
The Petitioner contended that there was no provision for issuance of such an advisory under Section 50(1) and that initiation of recovery under Section 79 without following due process was impermissible.
The Respondent submitted that the advisory merely intimated the Petitioner of its outstanding liability and that actual recovery would only follow due procedure under Rule 142B, including issuance of Form GST DRC-01D, which is treated as notice of recovery under the law.
Issue:
Whether recovery of interest under Section 50(1) of the GST Act can be initiated based on an advisory without issuance of a notice under Rule 142B?
Held:
The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in R/Special Civil Application No. 5453 of 2025 held as under:
- Observed that, as per Section 50(1) of the GST Act, interest is payable on delayed payment of self-assessed tax, and such interest must be calculated in accordance with Rule 88B of the GST Rules.
- Noted that, under Section 75(12) of the GST Act, interest payable on self-assessed tax can be recovered under Section 79 notwithstanding anything in Sections 73 or 74.
- Noted that, Rule 142B, inserted with effect from August 4, 2023, mandates issuance of an intimation in Form GST DRC-01D for recovery under Section 79.
- Held that, recovery action under Section 79 cannot be initiated unless such intimation is issued, and the Petitioner is given an opportunity to respond.
- Noted that, the advisory merely references Section 79 to alert the Petitioner of potential recovery, but no recovery can be enforced unless Form GST DRC-01D is served.
Our Comments:
The Court’s decision affirms that recovery of interest on self-assessed tax under Section 50(1) is not automatic and must follow a defined procedure. The judgment distinguishes the earlier ruling of the Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court in the case of Mahadeo Construction Co. vs Union of India [W.P. (T) No. 3517 Of 2019], on the ground that the same was rendered prior to the insertion of Rule 142B and Form DRC-01D. The Gujarat High Court’s reasoning is consistent with the current legal framework post-amendment, emphasizing that taxpayer is safeguarded before coercive recovery actions are undertaken. Rule 142B ensures notice and opportunity to be heard before recovery under Section 79.
CLICK HERE FOR OFFICIAL JUDGMENT COPY
(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
