No provision under GST for reserving judgment and delivering the same later
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in M/s Sun Glass Works Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Others [Writ Tax […]
Allahabad HC
Regular Bail is granted to Accused in Fake ITC Case amid confessional statement and Trial Delays
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Gaurav & Anr. v. Union of India [W.P.(C) 1505/2024] dated May 21, 2025] allowed
Buyer cannot be asked to reverse ITC in case of default by the Supplier in filing of returns & deposit of tax
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of R.T. Infotech v. Additional Commissioner Grade 2 & Ors. [Writ Tax
GST Registration Cancellation order set aside as no physical notice was served
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Kanhaiya Traders v. State of U.P. [Writ Tax No. 2292 of 2025 dated May
Form GST MOV-09 is mandatory to be issued by the GST Department despite payment of penalty has been made to release the goods
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Aries Agro Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh [Writ Tax No.
GST registration cannot be cancelled mechanically without taking into consideration the points in reply, statements and evidence recorded during verification
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Genius Ortho Industries v. Union of India [Writ Tax No. 542
Allahabad High Court dismisses Patanjali’s challenge to ₹273.5 crore GST penalty
The Allahabad High Court on May 29 dismissed Patanjali Ayurved Limited’s challenge to a ₹273.5-crore Goods and Service Tax (GST)
Carrying a valid E-Way Bill is mandatory for the movement of goods from one place to another
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in M/s. Lalitpur Power Generation Company Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Ors [Writ Tax
Personal hearing is mandatory before passing the order
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) in the case of Prem Traders v. State of Uttar Pradesh [Writ Petition
After HC order: State tax dept reinforces authorities’ power to seize undervalued goods
The state tax department has issued a circular reinforcing tax officials’ authority to seize goods transported with undervalued invoices, following
